Short stories take symbolism and use it to its fullest I think. By the time we are done reading a short story we spend more time trying to figure out what it meant than we do for a novel or a part of novel. There are more questions that come about in short stories, fundamental, basic questions like "has the narrator been dead this whole time?" or "who were Desiree's parents/ why was she purposely left behind?"
I think good short stories usually make us ask ourselves more questions than provide answers. It also seems to me, a novel provides a few answers to various problems in life, showing how particular characters overcome or at least deal with them. For example in both The Lamplighterand The Wide Wide World the authors both spent a great deal of time developing the father and mother figures to the readers, respectively. In particular we can see that the bible scene in The Wide Wide World takes roughly six pages. Keeping this in mind if we compare it to Desiree's Baby with a total length of five pages, and the types of questions we had to ask ourselves when we were done reading both, we can really understand the different ways each make us think.
I completely agree with you - readers become way more attached to characters they have spent hours reading about. But just because we more emotionally attached does not mean that a short story cannot be just as moving.
ReplyDeleteI agree with both of yall too! It is difficult to become really invested in any of the characters when you are trying to focus on what is going on in the short story. I believe you have to pay so much attention to the plot and other details that the characters are less important.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with the two above comments. Also, as I finished the text I was left a bit confused. I spent a lot of time trying to read deeper into the text and find out what the author's real meaning is.
ReplyDelete